Watched the animated reconstruction in black and white, as well as the one surviving clip from episode 1 and the surviving episode 3.
To put my conclusion up front: it’s a perfect example of many interesting and clever parts not automatically leading to a good serial. At the same time, all the clever parts prevent it from being bad. Even hampered by the loss of three-quarters of the original material and said material being replaced by very bad animation, it’s still a 3/5 for me. Watching the surviving original stuff, I guess it would be 3.5/5 with better animation or if all original episodes were still available. So, on a scale from 1 to 10, a solid 7/10.
The depiction of the all-women Drahvins is interesting. At first, I thought ‘militaristic/fascist,’ but later on, I got more of a vibe of a society structured in a beehive kind of way: the males not really counting for anything (drones), most of the people being quite simple-minded and ‘bred’ that way (worker bees), with a few individuals who are actually unique. In bees, a main factor for becoming a queen is the food. In the serial, the ‘Soldier-Drahvins’ get different food than their leader, the ‘queen’ of that little hive.
So, that’s my headcanon for now. Maybe I’ll read up on the intentions of the creators of this story later on.
In the serial, it is mentioned that ‘the Drahvins kill,’ etc. I guess most viewers will take this as all the Drahvins being like Maaga and her little crew. Starting to think about Drahvin society, I became aware that that’s not necessarily true. Not even the Rills saying that necessarily think that way. Because it’s just not usual to say things like ‘the Drahvins we encountered’ or ‘the Drahvins stranded on this planet.’ It is usual to shorten such things to ‘the Drahvins’ when the context is clear for all. Who else but the Drahvins they encountered and are now stranded on the planet and as they have only one ‘fully thinking individual,’ more precisely their leader Maaga should be meant? Not necessary to spell that out when talking about ‘the Drahvins’ in the context they were talked about.
So, again headcanon kicking in, I think probably not all “Queen Drahvins” have the same sadistic character as Maaga. Brilliantly portrayed by Stephanie Bidmead, her facial expression when doing cruel things like fantasizing about letting the Rills and the TARDIS team die on the planet was top performance and sadly missed in the animated reconstruction.
The animated reconstruction has really beautiful backgrounds but is massively lacking in character design. Comparing the surviving original material with the reconstructed one, I noticed a big difference in how I interpreted the story. For example, having not watched ‘The Chase’ and ‘The Time Meddler’ for quite some time, this episode served as a reintroduction to Steven for me. My first impression? I have to say, I did not like him. What a tool.
But then I watched the surviving clip from episode one: astonishing how much more sympathetic Steven came across when played by a real actor with all the facial expressions and body language that brings with it.
But not only does the way the characters were animated remove facial expressions and body language, but the character design is also clearly a botched job. I mean, not even the relative height of the characters is correct. It did not impact my viewing experience at the beginning, but as the serial went on, this hampered it more and more. This was not helped by the circumstance that this is a serial where the audio track really, really depends on the visuals accompanying it to form a good whole, in my opinion.
I really liked the Doctor in this serial. He remains level-headed, calmly assessing the situation and not just taking things at face value. This is afforded by the character of Steven being as he is. As bad as my first impression of Steven (mainly because of the animation) was, I really like the dynamic this character brings to the table.
The idea of the Rills being—from a human point of view—monstrous-looking, toxic gas-breathing but also very wise and friendly beings is very interesting. As an avid reader and watcher of sci-fi, it’s not really an astonishing concept for me in the here and now. But when I try to imagine the impact that serial would have had on me when I was a child, I have to applaud the creators of the serial. It would have really blown my mind (just as other stories I actually read as a child did back then).
Speaking of the Rills: I really liked the design for the Chumblies. And astonishingly enough, it worked not only in the animated version but also in the live-action version. Respect.
Absolute genius, the short dialogue between the Doctor and Vicki when she threw the stone.
There is probably more I liked, stuff I am just not thinking of at the moment. So why did the serial not quite land with me?
Besides the problem with the missing episodes reconstructed in a way that makes the serial probably worse than it originally was, there are just too many micro-incongruencies in it. The parts do not quite fit together. For example, should Vicki’s reaction regarding the alien Rills have been as negative as it was, seeing that she is from the future when mankind had already gone to the stars (and she had a ‘monstrous’ creature as a pet)?
But accepting that, shouldn’t it have then taken a little longer or needed an explicit transition to the 180° change of attitude to trusting and liking the Rills? In my opinion, there were just too many of these—oftentimes micro, but the amount does it—jumps in the story.