This was a frustrating listen. It comes close to asking some really interesting questions, but in the end shys away from all of them.
I love the idea of exploring primeval Traken (I mean, look at my username) but I don’t think the setting is developed well. We don’t learn anything new about the planet, nor is Nyssa’s relationship with the world she saw destroyed delved into at all. This should be Nyssa’s story, but it really isn’t: she spends most of it either dying or trailing around in a swimming costume (which the script simply has to keep reminding us of, ew). There was such potential to explore her character and it was never taken.
The other characters are pretty bland, with the exception of Kwundaar, played wonderfully by Stephen Greif. (Blake’s 7 digression: I like Brian Croucher’s performance, but Greif is definitely my favourite Travis.) The revelation that Kwundaar is an old Trakenite god is predictable but an interesting idea.
Kwundaar is a major part of one of my problems with Primeval, though. The setup suggests we’ll be dealing with themes of good and evil, but the story itself never questions what exactly it means by ‘evil’—or, indeed, good. At the end of the day, Kwundaar is evil, not just because he’s a villain, but by the rules of the script he simply is. There are no shades of grey.
I also thought this story had great potential to explore Traken’s role as a utopia (or a pre-utopia: the death penalty is still in place, for example). How does an apparently perfect society sustain itself?
For Traken, the answer is the Source. It’s established that the Source is a machine: it provides unlimited energy, it shields its population from disease and harm. There are fascinating questions here- what are the consequences of having a world governed by a system?
Again, the story shys away from them. The Source is just a tool, the Doctor says: it could be used for good or for evil. Kwundaar would use it for evil, but the Trakenites are using it for good. It’s that black and white. That feels to me like a huge cop-out. There’s no interrogation of the fundamentals of Traken society, and of the potential costs of a utopia. That should be the bread and butter of a story like this, but it just throws it away. There are no costs.*
I also think the story is a bit dismissive of faith and religion in general, exemplified in the character of Anona, who the script was particularly cruel to.
I don’t dislike Primeval—I did enjoy the plot to an extent, but it was let down by its inability to handle its own themes. It feels like it wants to say a lot and comes away saying very little. A 6/10 from me.
*Again, not saying that a every fictional utopia should necessarily have some sort of ugly underbelly; just that the concept of a utopia in a story should be questioned. That’s what Omelas was about after all—interrogating our responses to fictional utopias. Anyway, this post is already far too long!